“I have forgiven mistakes” From Charlie Chaplin ??? Vida by Augusto Branco ???

ALERT from: charliechaplin.com THIS TEXT DON’T BELONG’S TO CHAPLIN! I DIDN’T FIND THIS TEXT IN ANY CHAPLIN’S BOOK. SOMEBODY HAVE SOME SOURCE FOR THIS TEXT?

It seems, it belongs to Augusto Branco, and is titled Vida http://augustobranco.blogspot.com/2011/09/vida.html Thank you to Nuria Macia

“I have forgiven mistakes that were unforgivable, I have tried to replace those who were unreplaceable and tried to forget those who were unforgettable. I have done things on impulse. I have been let down by those whom I thought would never let me down but I have also let others down. I have laughed when It was almost impossible to laugh. I have held someone to protect them. I have made life long friends, I’ve loved and been loved. I have screamed and jumped for joy, I have lived on love and made eternal promises of love. I have fallen many times. I have cried while listening to music and also when looking at photos. I have called someone just to hear their voice. I have fallen in love with a smile. I have also thought I was going to die from loosing someone special and I did loose them! but I lived! And I still live! I don’t allow life to pass me by and neither should you! Live! What is really good is to fight with determination, embrace life and live it with passion! Loose your battles with class and dare to win because the world belongs to those who dare and life, Life is worth too much to be insignificant…”

Vida by Augusto Branco

” Já perdoei erros quase imperdoáveis,
tentei substituir pessoas insubstituíveis
e esquecer pessoas inesquecíveis.

Já fiz coisas por impulso,
já me decepcionei com pessoas
que eu nunca pensei que iriam me decepcionar,
mas também já decepcionei alguém.

Já abracei pra proteger,
já dei risada quando não podia,
fiz amigos eternos,
e amigos que eu nunca mais vi.

Amei e fui amado,
mas também já fui rejeitado,
fui amado e não amei.

Já gritei e pulei de tanta felicidade,
já vivi de amor e fiz juras eternas,
e quebrei a cara muitas vezes!

Já chorei ouvindo música e vendo fotos,
já liguei só para escutar uma voz,
me apaixonei por um sorriso,
já pensei que fosse morrer de tanta saudade
e tive medo de perder alguém especial (e acabei perdendo).

Mas vivi!
E ainda vivo!
Não passo pela vida.
E você também não deveria passar!

Viva!!

Bom mesmo é ir à luta com determinação,
abraçar a vida com paixão,
perder com classe
e vencer com ousadia,
porque o mundo pertence a quem se atreve
e a vida é MUITO para ser insignificante.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Personality Types, T-personality, toxic, & N personality, nourishing, Osho, The Passion For the Impossible,

Personality Types

I feel I have a legacy of laziness and escapism. Either I don’t feel energy, or if I do, I find it difficult to just completely let go. I feel a control.

I feel it is somewhere and has become part of your bio-computer. The mind functions as a computer, and we go on feeding it attitudes. They go on accumulating there and by and by they become deeply ingrained. Personalities can be divided into two categories. One, psychologists call the T-personality, toxic, and the other they call the N personality, nourishing.

A toxic personality is always looking at things in a negative way. The whole world view of the toxic personality is depressing, sad. The toxic personality hides in beautiful faces. A perfectionist is a toxic personality. You cannot say that something is wrong in a perfectionist, but the whole idea of being a perfectionist is to find errors, mistakes, loopholes. It is a trick. You cannot find any fault with a man who looks for perfection, but in fact that is not his goal; perfection is a device. He wants to look at loopholes, mistakes, errors, anything that is missing, and this is the best way — to keep a goal of perfection so that he can compare them with the ideal and always condemn.

This toxic personality always thinks of that which is not and never looks at that which is, so discontent becomes natural. A toxic personality poisons his own being; not only that — he drips poison.

It can be a heritage. If you have lived with people in your childhood who had a negative attitude towards life…. It may be hiding in glowing terms, beautiful language, ideals, heaven, God, religion, the soul; they can use beautiful words, but they are simply trying…and they talk about the other world just to condemn this one. They are not concerned with the other world. They have no interests in saints, but just to prove that others are sinners, they will talk about saints.

It is a very morbid attitude. They will say, ‘Become like Jesus.’ They are not interested in Jesus at all. If Jesus were there they would be the last person to go to him, but just to condemn you, this is their device. You cannot become Jesus, so you become a victim. They always condemn you. They create values, moralities, puritan attitudes. They are the moralists, the moralisers; they are the great poisoners of the world.

And they are everywhere. These people tend to become teachers, educationalists, professors, vice-chancellors, saints, bishops, popes; they tend to become these things because then they can condemn. They are even ready to sacrifice everything if they are just allowed the joy of condemning others. They are everywhere, hiding in many ways. And they are always doing things for your good, for your own good, so you are defenceless against them. Their heritage is real, big. They have dominated the whole history.

These people immediately become dominators. Their very ideology helps them to dominate because they can become condemnators. And they talk in rational terms. Rationalism is also part of the T personality. They are very argumentative…very difficult to defeat them in argumentation. They are never reasonable, but they are always rational.

One must know the distinction between a reasonable man and a rational man. A reasonable man is never only rational, because a reasonable man knows by experience that life has both — the rational and the irrational; that life has both — reason and feeling, the mind and the heart.

A reasonable man is reasonable. A rational man is never reasonable. He forces logic on life — and logic can be perfect; life can never be. He always looks to the ideal, and he tries to force life to follow the ideal. He never looks into life and the reality of life. His ideals are against life.

The second personality, the N personality, the nourishing personality, is totally different. It has no ideals, really. It just looks into life and the reality decides its ideal. It is very reasonable. It is never perfectionistic; it is wholistic but never a perfectionist. And it always looks on the good side of things. The N personality is always hopeful, radiant, adventurous, trusting, not condemnatory. These are the people who become poets, painters, musicians.

If an N-type person becomes a saint, then there is a real saint. If a T-type person becomes a saint, there is a false saint, a pseudo-saint. If an N-type person becomes a father, then there is a real father. If an N type person becomes a mother, there is real mothering. A T-type is a pseudo father and a pseudo mother. That is just a trick to exploit the child, to torture, to dominate, possess and to crush the child, to feel powerful by crushing the child. The T-type is in the majority, so you may be right that you are carrying a heritage everybody is. But once you become aware, there is not much of a problem. You can travel from T to N very easily.

A few things to remember. If you feel lazy, don’t call it laziness. Listen to your nature; maybe that’s what fits you. That’s what I call a reasonable man. What can you do? If laziness comes to you, then that’s what you have to do. Who are you to decide against it? And how can you win against it? Even in your fight you will be lazy. Who is going to win? You will be constantly defeated, and then you will feel unnecessarily miserable.

Be realistic. Listen to your own being. Everybody has his own pace. A few people are very active, rushing; nothing is wrong in it. If they feel good in it, it is good for them.

And don’t create any ideals that you have to do this. Don’t have any ‘shoulds’. The ‘should’ creates a sort of neurosis. Then one is obsessed. The ‘should’ is always there, standing and condemning you, and you cannot enjoy anything. Enjoy! Kill the ‘should’ completely and be herenow. Whatsoever you can do, do; whatsoever you cannot do, accept. That is the way you are, and you are here to be yourself, nobody else. By and by you will see that your T is turning into N. You will become nourishing and you will enjoy more, you will love more, and you will become more meditative.

In fact, for a lazy person to become meditative is easier than for an active person. That’s why the whole East became lazy — they meditated too much. Meditation is a sort of passivity. An active person feels very restless. Just to sit silent is the most difficult thing. Not to do anything is the most difficult thing to do for an active person.

Just enjoy and move as fits your being — no shoulds, no ideals, otherwise they will poison you. Look at life with deep hope. It is really beautiful. Just look at it, and don’t wait for perfection. Don’t think in terms of your enjoying things only when they are perfect; then you will never enjoy.

If a T-type person encounters God, he will immediately find some faults in him. That’s why God is hiding…because of T-type people. He reveals himself to the N-type, never to T-types. He reveals only to those who can take nourishment from him — not only that, but to those who can nourish him.

So just relax, enjoy, accept, and the problems will disappear.

Osho, The Passion For the Impossible (No Longer Available at Osho’s Request)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Nataka Bharata Natyam Dance Company

Nataka Bharata Natyam Dance Company Set

Posted in Indian Classical Dance, Live Performing Photography, Photography | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Tao of Photography – Creative Process by Andy Ilachinsky

The Mystical Way of Photography

from Blog Tao of Photography

I have just about finished preparing a set of powerpoint slides for a presentation I was invited to give early next year by the Silver Spring Camera Club (in Maryland). My “guest appearance” is scheduled for 7:30 pm – 9:30 pm on January 7, 2010 (a thursday) at the Marvin Memorial United Methodist Church

(33 University Boulevard E., Silver Spring; corner of University and Colesville Rd.).

My talk consists of a brief bio (of myself as a “work in progress” photographer), a summary of my artistic journey thus far, a few “lessons” I’ve learned, a sampling of old and new portfolios, and ideas on how Eastern philosophy can help aspiring artists nurture their creativity. It is in regard to this last set of musings that I’d like to devote this blog entry to.

One of my all-time favorite quotes appears in the Ching-te Ch’uan Teng lu (“Transmission of the Lamp,” assembled by Tao-Yuan of the line Fa-Yen Wen (885-958):

“Before I had studied Zen for thirty years,

I saw mountains as mountains,

and waters as waters…

When I arrived at a more intimate knowledge,
I came to the point where I saw
that mountains are not mountains,
and waters are not waters.

But now that I have got its very substance I am at rest.
For it’s just that I see mountains once again as mountains,
and waters once again as waters.”

This sage insight describes not only life but – recursively, self-referentially – every aspect of the creative field that defines and nourishes it, including, of course, art and photography.

Now, anchored by the Buddhist quote above, consider the corresponding stages of growth of a photographer:

Stage 1: At first, the photographer sees mountains as mountains and waters as waters…

…the photographer searches for the picture. The slide shows an image I took last year when my wife and I visited Santorini, Greece. Why did I take this particular shot? What creative energies and motivations, internal and external, compelled me to point my camera in this direction at this time to record this emphemeral reality? Perhaps, being a physicist, I was drawn by the geometry, or entropic decay of the door? (In truth, the more meaningful question to ask is: “Why has the universe evolved in such a way as to have this image materialize at a certain point in time and space?”, but please read on…) Of course, different photographers have different backgrounds, are motivated by different needs, and have different aesthetic temperaments and creative urges. One photographer might be attracted to light and geometry; another to history and culture; still another to textures and contrasts. But in all cases, the aspiring artist is in search of some “thing,” and happy when she stumbles upon an object of interest.

While the resulting pictures are undeniably products of individual needs and aspirations, and thus necessarily reflect some part of the photographer responsible for creating them, they stand alone – at least at this early juncture (in the photographer’s evolution as an artist) – as objects essentially of their own creation. They are what they are: a landscape, a portrait, a family picture, … Some are better than others, but each is also more likely than not “yet another instance” of a picture that has been taken by countless other more or less talented photographers (though – importantly – for very different “reasons”). Trees are trees, portraits are portraits, and few, if any, of the images – as individual images – reveal much about the photographer that created them. The connection between creative energy and created “object” is not yet visible, and exists only in latent form.

Stage 2: Later, the photographer no longer sees mountains as mountains and waters as waters…

…instead, the photographer begins losing herself in her pictures, thus freeing the pictures to discover their – and her – path. (Instances of a given) tree grow into trees, of different kinds, in different light, at different times – of year and of the photographer’s own inner state. The growing set of images evolves to encompass other, related aspects, of the shifting reality the photographer – partly consciously and partly unconsciously -immerses herself in. Perhaps rocks appear, perhaps water, then fog, then leaves, and – later – by an emergence of entirely new “nonphysical” categories – like abstraction, or tao; perhaps the photographer finds herself experimenting with color, or doing away with categories altogether.

Aesthetic meaning transitions from individual pictures to collections of interrelated imagery, which itself evolves – sometimes backtracking, sometimes taking lateral, seemingly “stagnant” unproductive steps – weaves in and out of itself, but also inexorably, inevitably, forges a unique path. One that is unmistakably and uniquely of the artist. Others that are allowed (even a partial) glimpse of the growing work – of the waypoints along the living path – can see past the “individual images” (that “anyone” with a requisite amount of talent and experience could also have created, but – again – for vastly different reasons) to see the first hints of a unique creative field at work. Paradoxically, the best artists are almost always the last to “see” these faint stirrings of new levels in their own work, even as they keep reaching upward. No path is the same as any other, and the path that emerges for a given artist is as much a product of the artist as it is of itself. The perceived duality between creative field and created form is much the same as all dualities; which is to say it is illusory. But the artist is not yet at the stage to see past illusion. Indeed, the artist uses the duality between self and world – exploits it! – to forge a path that others in the world see as uniquely hers.

Stage 3: Eventually (if the artist has journeyed on a sincere – and sincerely discovered – path), she once again sees mountains as mountains and waters as waters…

…and, in the end, finally discovers herself. The (unending) path defines the photographer! Not as a passive collage of “photographs taken,” but as an active embodiment of the artist’s spirit. The creative field awakens to a new reality in which all divisions between self, path, and creation have no meaning, save for the unending process and timeless yearning to create. There is only the creative field, journeying into the infinite depths of its own self.

The photographer finds a picture, that discovers a path, that defines the artist, that is the photographer, that finds a picture….

Now look deeper still, beyond even this “last” step; beyond the “Ouroborian” synthesis of self and process (which is an important portal to the ultimate ground of all being, but not an end…), a place where words – and even pictures – begin to fail….now, what do you see?

Note: Interested readers can download the full set of powerpoint slides of my upcoming talk: low-res version (4 MB), high-res version (16 MB).

Posted in Photography, Photography and Eastern Knowledge | Tagged | Leave a comment

Exhibition India rue Poirier Marseille Performance Yanis and Fred

Exhibition India rue Poirier Marseille Performance Yanis and Fred Set

Posted in Exhibitions, India, Live Performing Photography, Outsider Photography, Photography | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Tao of Photography – Seeing Beyond Seeing – Review by Timothy D. Morton

PSA Journal, Feb, 2002 by Timothy D. Morton

“The Tao of Photography – Seeing Beyond Seeing”

Publisher: Ten Speed Press [c] 2001, 136 pages, $24.95

Philippe L. Gross grew up in Switzerland. His early interest in photography led him to the study of optics. He studied psychology at the University of Hawaii, and is now a university lecturer, photographer and Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Transpersonal Studies.

S.I. Shapiro is a Professor of Psychology at the University of Hawaii, author of numerous articles, and the Executive Editor of the International Journal of Transpersonal Studies. He took up photography after the birth of his son.

Learning to see creatively is perhaps the hardest aspect of modern photography; today’s electronic cameras have taken over so much of the technology of photography, but the essence of the art — seeing, understanding, composing — is still the prerogative of the photographer only. So an analysis of some of the psychology of photography, by two such distinguished professionals, is a welcome text.

Central to Taoism is the concept of liberation. The authors stress that photography, as a force for aesthetic liberation, should be able to free itself from the formal constrictions that convention has imposed. The photographer should train to see beauty, order and meaning through the lens, rather than study to reproduce, in various forms, the traditional subjects and structures of the art.

The beautifully reproduced photographs and the quotations from various artists focus the reader’s attention on some of the key issues that the authors stress. They quote Ernst Haas: “I am not interested in shooting new things, I am interested in seeing things new.” Camera angle, point of view, use of shadow, willingness to shoot dark subjects — all these point to the authors’ thesis that photography is a construction of reality rather than a representation of it. And, moreover, the authors stress that the experience of a photograph is that of the viewer, not the photographer. When we “take a picture” we should realize that we are making a representation of nature that must be new and meaningful to the viewer. So, for example, a portrait by Philippe L. Gross called “Stride” shows a walking figure shot from above with only the body from below the waist visible. But it is not a portrait with the head cut off — rather it is a perception of the act of walking. Ideally, the viewer will now perceive this act differently.

Sometimes, the effect is comic, as in a picture of three mail-boxes, one closed, two open. The comic effect, however, is not in the boxes themselves; it is a perception of the incongruous which the photographer imparts to the viewer.

The text is theoretical, and not always easy reading, but the impact is strong.

COPYRIGHT 2002 Photographic Society of America, Inc.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Gale Group
Posted in Photography, Photography and Eastern Knowledge | Tagged | Leave a comment

Sospel’s Shadows

Sospel’s Shadows Set

Posted in Everyday Life, Photography | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Photography and Meditation by Stephen Batchelor

Photography and Meditation

Stephen Batchelor has been taking photographs  since the age of sixteen.  Before becoming involved in Buddhism, he had intended to pursue a career as a photographer. He abandoned photography on becoming a monk in 1974.  He resumed it when he went to Songgwangsa Monastery in South Korea in 1981. From then until his return to the West in 1985 he took hundreds of colour slides in Korea, Japan, China and Tibet. In 1986 he returned to Tibet to write The Tibet Guide (1989) (see Publications) and provided many of the photographs for the first edition of the book. More recent work is found in Martine Batchelor’s Meditation for Life (2001) (see Publications), for which he provided sixty colour and black and white images.  Buddha Mind in Contemporary Art, edited by Jacquelynn Baas and Mary Jane Jacob (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004) includes Stephen’s essay “Seeing the Light: Photography as Buddhist Practice.”  An abridged version of the following essay appeared in Meditation for Life.

Taking photographs and practising meditation might seem at first glance to be unrelated activities.  For while photography looks outwards at the visual world through the medium of a camera, meditation focuses inwards on unmediated experience.   And whereas photography is concerned with producing images of reality, meditation is about seeing reality as it is.  Yet in taking photographs and practising meditation over the past three decades, I find the two activities have converged to the point where I no longer think of them as different.
As practices, both meditation and photography demand commitment, discipline and technical skill.  Possession of these qualities does not, however, guarantee that meditation will lead to great wisdom any more than photography will culminate in great art.  To go beyond mere expertise in either domain requires a capacity to see the world in a new way.   Such seeing originates in a penetrating and insatiable curiosity about things.  It entails recovering an innocent, childlike wonder at life while suspending the adult’s conviction that the world is simply the way it appears.
The pursuit of meditation and photography leads away from fascination with the extraordinary and back to a rediscovery of the ordinary.  Just as I once hoped for mystical transcendence through meditation, so I assumed exotic places and unusual objects to be the ideal subjects for photography.   Instead I have found that meditative awareness is a heightened understanding and feeling for the concrete, sensuous events of daily existence.  Likewise, the practice of photography has taught me just to pay closer attention to what I see around me everyday.  Some of the most satisfying pictures I have taken have been of things in the immediate vicinity of where I live and work.
Both photography and meditation require an ability to focus steadily on what is happening in order to see more clearly.  To see in this way involves “shifting” to a frame of mind in which the habitual view of a familiar and self-evident world is replaced by a keen sense of the unprecedented and unrepeatable configuration of each moment.  Whether you are paying mindful attention to the breath as you sit in meditation or whether you are composing an image in a viewfinder, you find yourself hovering before a fleeting, tantalizing reality.
At this point, the tasks of the meditator and the photographer appear to diverge.  While the meditator cultivates uninterrupted, non-judgemental awareness of the moment, the photographer captures the moment in releasing the shutter.   But in practice the aesthetic decision to freeze an image on film crystallizes rather than interrupts the contemplative act of observation. Aligning one’s body and senses in those final microseconds before taking a picture momentarily heightens the intensity and immediacy of the image.  One is afforded a glimpse into the heart of the moment that meditative awareness might fail to provide.
“To take photographs,” wrote Henri Cartier-Bresson, “is to hold one’s breath when all faculties converge in the face of fleeing reality. …  It is putting one’s head, one’s eyes and one’s heart on the same axis. …  It is a way of shouting, of freeing oneself, not of proving or asserting one’s originality.  It is a way of life.”  These words of the renowned French photographer define photography as an ongoing meditative relationship to the world.  For Cartier-Bresson, photography is not merely a profession but a liberating engagement with life itself,  the camera not just a machine for recording images but “an instrument of intuition and spontaneity.”
To be moved to take photographs, like being inspired to practise meditation, is to embark on a path.  In both cases you follow an intuitive hunch rather than a carefully considered decision.  Something about “photography” or “meditation” draws you irresistably.  While you may initially justify your interest in these pursuits with clear and compelling reasons, the further you proceed along their respective paths, the less you need to explain yourself.  The very act of taking a photograph or sitting in meditation is sufficient justification in itself.  The notion of an end result to be attained at some point in the future is replaced by an understanding of how the goal of photography or meditation is right here, waiting to be realized each moment.
Both meditation and photography are concerned with light.  Meditators speak of “enlightenment”: an experience in which “light” metaphorically dispels the “darkness” of the mind.  Similarly, by means of an odd angle, an unusual arrangement of light and shade or an adjustment in the depth of field, a photographer illuminates something about an object which had previously been unnoticed.  Such photography has nothing to do with preserving a pictorial record of things, places and people that are already familiar.  It opens up the world in a startling and unexpected way that can be both compelling and unsettling.
The photographer’s concern with light is also a real one.  For with insufficient light, one simply cannot take a photograph.  Yet the closer you attend to what is seen in the viewfinder, the more you notice how the light which illuminates and the object being illuminated are not two separate things.  An object is just as much the medium through which light becomes apparent as light is the medium through which an object becomes apparent.  You cannot have one without the other.  In taking a photograph of an object, you are taking a photograph of a condition of light.
When this separation between what illuminates and what is illuminated begins to dissolve, it becomes increasingly difficult to regard the object being photographed as a thing existing in its own right “out there.”   As soon as you make the perceptual shift to seeing the object as a condition of light, what you observe becomes as tentative, shimmering and luminous as light itself.   In paying more attention to the display of light rather than “something” illuminated by light, photography starts to move away from representation towards abstraction.   The photographer becomes absorbed by the restless contrasts of line, colour, shading, what is in and out of focus to the point where the object as a recognizable “thing” disappears.
This is where the path of photography has led me at the time of writing.  My photographs, taken over many years, reflect various stages in this journey.  They also mirror my engagement with the process of Buddhist meditation.  For both paths have served to deepen my understanding of the fleeting, poignant and utterly contingent nature of things.

Posted in Photography, Photography and Eastern Knowledge | Tagged | Leave a comment

Timothy Allen – Meditation – The story behind the image – From BBC Earth Blog

Timothy Allen

Meditation The story behind the image

Canon 5D, 85mm f1.8 lens. 1/250 at f5.6
Canon 5D, 85mm f1.2 lens, 1/250 @ f5.6, ISO 1250

I shot this picture a couple of years ago whilst on a 4 week trip through the Himalayan kingdom of Bhutan.  Bhutan can be a complicated country in which to travel since, as a visitor you are required to take a guided tour as your means of travel through the kingdom.  Of course, nothing is ever set in stone and it wasn’t too long after meeting my guide and driver that we agreed to modify our pre-planned  itinerary and tread a rather less travelled path through this fantastic country by visiting Bhutanese people in their own homes.

This image was one of the first photos I took in Bhutan, and still one of my favourites.  On my first day in Thimpu, Bhutan’s sleepy capital city, I asked my guide to take me to visit his relatives and on the way we passed an old friend of the family slowly trudging his way up a road quietly chanting and spinning his prayer wheel.  That day it was Neowney, a week long religious duty of mantra chanting and fasting that most of Thimpu’s elderly citizens were taking part in at the time.  The family friend agreed for us to come with him and we followed him up to Changangkha Lhakhang temple.

As a first introduction to Bhutan, I think you would struggle to find a more atmospherically charged scene than a room full of meditating people lit only by two small doorways at the front left and right sides of the room.  Needless to say, this image was one of an abundance of photographic gifts being offered at that time.  Every face in the room told a different story, but it was this lady, quietly sitting at the front in deep meditation who stole the show for me.  Later on in the day, outside the temple we showed her the image on my laptop.  In that beautiful way that only wise old Buddhists know how, she smiled and carried on about her duties at the temple, unimpressed.

Taking a photograph like this is not hard at all.  The only prerequisites are a darkish background and a suitable light source emanating from only one direction, in this case a door to the front right.  One thing you must be sure of is to remember to meter for just the highlights that you can see.  This will involve shooting with your camera set to manual and adjusting your exposure accordingly, something I would advise you to get into the habit of doing at all times if you are serious about your photography.  By exposing for just the highlights on the woman’s face, the rest of the dimly lit background disappears into complete darkness.

Another frame from the same scene.  The lady is now bottom left, looking away from camera

Another frame from the same scene. The lady is now bottom left, looking away from camera

As you can see from this second frame.  There was no shortage of images in the room on that day.  For me though, the tight framing of the lady gives the first image a greater sense of the intimacy of a quiet moment such as meditation.

Timothy Allen

Posted in Photography, Photography and Eastern Knowledge | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Happy Paradox of Photography and Meditation in SOF Observed

The Happy Paradox of Photography and Meditation

I raced to get to the pond in Arlington, hoping there would still be some light left when I got there. Luckily, there was about five minutes of great sunlight left, and it left lovely colors on the edge of the clouds, and glowing through to the still surface of the water.

Creating a photograph is like meditation, full of paradoxes that coexist happily. The perfect shot cannot be captured by chasing it into a corner, and yet you must have the persistent drive to do it. You must be open to seeing something unique and special in the current moment, but having a vision for what the perfect shot is will help you to record it.

It is dazzling to me how there is such a dance and flow between these various things. Perhaps the most important thing is to know when to run after a shot and when to back off and let your eyes and camera focus elsewhere, when to envision the end product and when to let the subject tell you what it wants to show, when to be in the moment but stay committed to letting your eye and your equipment be used to portray that thing of beauty.

Monica BiswasMonica Biswas is a photographer and mother living in Belmont, Massachusetts. You can view more of her images that help her connect her “own thoughts, reflections and intentions” on her website.

Posted in Photography, Photography and Eastern Knowledge | Tagged | Leave a comment